WordPress media / Free + Pro

EVERY FILE
DESERVES
A FAIR REVIEW.

Find accessibility issues before your audience does. Review images and PDFs, then publish with a process you can stand behind.

Free audits. Pro approval workflows. Both in development.

Fig. 1 — A media review, unpackedPro / process diagram
The layers of a media reviewAn exploded technical drawing of a document, its check evidence, a human review, and a release decision. Four numbered references correspond to the guide links below. 1234
  1. 1Private original
  2. 2Check evidence
  3. 3Human review
  4. 4Release decision

Planned Pro workflow. Automated checks support the decision; people review the context.

Built for WordPressImages & PDFsUniversities & public-sector teamsHuman judgment included

Two editions.
One standard
of care.

A missing description and an unreviewed report need different responses. Choose the tools your team needs.

Free edition

Find what needs attention.

Audit local image placements, inventory your PDFs, and keep a record of editorial review. Start making sense of your media library.

Explore Free
Pro edition

Put a review before release.

Keep new media private, check it against your policy, and route it for human review. Block supported publication paths until the requirements are met.

Explore Pro

Inspect the evidence.
Try the decision.

A file moves through checks and human review before it is eligible for release. Try this sample Pro review to see the difference between a completed check and an approval.

Read the protection boundaries
Media review / illustrative demoPro workflow
RELEASE QUEUE / sample fileOn hold

Annual report, under review.

annual-report.pdf · sample version 1

Selected policyWCAG 2.2 / AA
Storage statePrivate sample
Review requirementDisposition
Automated checksComplete
Reading order reviewRequired
Publication permissionWithheld
Not ready for release. A machine check is evidence. A reviewer makes the decision.

Interactive demonstration, not a live scan. Human review remains essential.

Evidence, then judgment

A green check
isn’t the whole story.

Software can catch missing text, inspect PDF structure, and flag risks. It cannot know whether an image description serves its purpose or a document reads in a sensible order.

Alt & Order puts those decisions in a review workflow, with the evidence attached.

What the checks can tell you

From upload
to an informed release.

The planned Pro workflow gives each file a clear status and each reviewer a clear next step.

01

Hold privately

New uploads and generated derivatives enter protected storage.

02

Gather evidence

Automated checks evaluate supported rules for your selected policy.

03

Review the context

A person checks meaning, reading order, and unresolved findings.

04

Release deliberately

A versioned approval permits publication through supported workflows.

Rules your institution
can actually follow.

Choose a WCAG version and target level. Keep policy changes deliberate, reviewed, and recorded.

Your policy, explicitly selected.

Planned support for WCAG 2.0, 2.1, or 2.2, with A, AA, or AAA targets. Coverage and human review requirements stay visible.

AI assists. People approve.

Optional OpenAI and Claude connections can draft alt text and long descriptions. Suggestions need editorial review before use.

One site or a whole network.

Pro brings network-level oversight for multisite teams, with policy inheritance, role controls, and a review trail.

Updates without surprise rules.

Standards changes are assessed, tested, and released as versioned policy updates. Administrators choose when to adopt them.

See the Pro approach

Start with visibility.
Add accountability.

Release information

The case is being built.

Alt & Order is in development. Downloads and checkout will be available when the plugin launches.

No payment is collected here. Freemius licensing and checkout are planned for launch.

Read the field guide